Category Archives: Talking to your customers

Green hushing

I recently came across the phrase ‘green hushing’. Green washing yes, but ‘green hushing’?

For those uninitiated, like me, it is apparently the practice of businesses keeping quiet about their sustainability efforts for fear of facing a backlash from commentators – anyone from clients, to influencers, the media, politicians or even their own employees – who might disagree with the organisation’s sustainability strategy.

Or it might also be that businesses don’t want to invite increased scrutiny on other, less wholesome areas of their business and perversely, trigger allegations of green washing. It’s a bit like believing that people living in glasshouses – or greenhouses in this instance – shouldn’t throw stones for fear of what might come flying back in return.

In many respects, you can’t blame a business for actively wanting to play down its green credentials given the gaping reputational traps lurking out there. And the regulators are on the case too when it comes to green washing. For example the Financial Conduct Authority has proposed “an anti-greenwashing rule in the ESG Sourcebook to help ensure that sustainability-related claims made by all authorised firms about their products and services are fair, clear, and not misleading, and consistent with the sustainability profile of the product or service.”

A green tick for your organisation’s sustainability approach?

Be real
So, should you or shouldn’t you promote that sustainability initiative? The communications conundrum reminds me of that nice old phrase, “You can’t do right for doing wrong”. But I think the answer is easy: the best communications always come from a place of authenticity.

Businesses should not be afraid to communicate what it is they stand for and what they’re doing to meet their sustainability objectives just because they fear possible negative publicity provided of course, that the communication is an authentic representation of what the business is trying to achieve from a sustainability perspective.

Five broadcast interview fails

No one says doing a broadcast interview is easy. Sweaty and stressful come to mind. But there are some obvious fails that I hear regularly that can be easily eradicated. And in the run up to the general election we’re not short of lots of material.

Of course, the obvious one is making no attempt to answer or even acknowledge the question – the cardinal sin beloved of politicians. There are lots of techniques to handle the questions you don’t want, but none of those techniques involve simply ignoring it.

But for this post, I’m looking at some of the more irritating smaller habits I’ve seen creep in to interviews that, in my book anyway, should have no place in a good interview and are very easy to banish before they hit the airwaves.

These are my top five broadcast fails:

  1. Thanking the interviewer for inviting you onto their programme
    Why thank them? You’re doing the programme a favour by sharing your expertise (and you’re not being paid for it either) so don’t adopt a feeling that you owe them something.
  2. Asking the interviewer ‘how are you?’
    It’s a waste of time and sounds insincere. Most of the time the interviewer won’t respond anyway because they’re too busy working on their opening question.
  3. Using the interviewer’s name
    It always sounds too pally – “Well, Jonathan, it’s like this…” – and frankly insincere. The even bigger offenders are the ones who keep using the interviewer’s name throughout the interview.
  4. “That’s a great question”
    Again, sounds insincere and is almost invariably untrue. In fact, this is a bad habit in any Q&A format where some people preface every reply by praising the question.
  5. Starting a reply with “So”
    It just sounds so

Boldly go and break the law*

No, I’m not suggesting you go out and rob the local bank, or even (and I’m talking to men here attending industry conferences or going to sporting events) wear red trousers – that really is unforgivable – I’m talking about many of the arcane laws of grammar and punctuation.

Who says for instance that you can’t start a sentence with a conjunction? “But we were taught never to do that,” I hear you scream. And, why shouldn’t you use one word sentences? Don’t believe everything. They. Tell. You.

 

image of 1 planeEnd with a preposition? That’s the stuff we want more of.

It can be fun to deliberately break the rules of grammar and punctuation to emphasise a point, add a bit of spice to your writing, or just to simply get a reaction. That said, you have to know you’re breaking the rules otherwise how do you know you’re breaking the rules? Where’s the fun in that?

So boldly go to split infinity, stick it to the punctuation pedants and grammar geeks and don’t be afraid to break those laws. Having said that, dangle your modifier and I’ll be coming for you…

*Any grammar and punctuation mistakes within this post are purely intentional (even the ones that aren’t).

Let’s all write like it’s 1984…

Good writing should, quite literally, be quite simple. So why, as we often see,  the temptation to over elaborate? Or, to put it another way, why do we succumb to verbosity as a means of conveying our meaning? (Can you see what I did there?)

George Orwell says a scrupulous writer should always ask ‘ could I put it more shortly’?

iStock_000000251967Medium
So here, courtesy of Orwell himself, are his five great writing tips:

 

(i) Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.

(ii) Never use a long word where a short one will do.

(iii) If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.

(iv) Never use the passive where you can use the active.

(v) Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.

 

How great leaders communicate

There’s nothing like an ambitious title for a blog and this one feels right up there along with 300 odd words on ‘How to do nuclear fusion’. But, here goes.

When you think about great historical figures who communicate well people like Churchill come to mind. A nice turn of phrase, consistent messaging, positive reinforcement, presence, and no little preparation resulted in a reputation as a great orator – though, interestingly, no one remembers his alleged struggles to overcome a speech impediment. Historians are divided as to whether he had a lisp, stuttered or simply liked a ‘loaded pause’.

Today’s leaders have it harder than he did in many ways given the number of communications channels they can use there and the expectation of delivering more. Some leaders, for good or ill, thrive on the immediacy of Twitter for example – dear departed Trump – while others are probably blissfully unaware as to what goes out under their name.

once upon a time

I want to communicate
What never changes though are the leaders – and I’m moving on to include business leaders and managers here – who are really good at communicating do it naturally. They have a distinctive voice; take every opportunity to communicate; are authentic (you can believe that what they’re saying is from them and represents their values); use wit and humour when appropriate; and take advice and feedback from those around them to improve. Probably most important though is their desire to communicate; they genuinely want to do it. Try media training someone who has no desire to talk to the media. It can be very painful.

For those who aren’t natural communicators, communication is a tougher job but no one says they need to be great orators. If they follow the same rules that come more naturally to the good communicator then why shouldn’t a bad communicator become a good communicator? And surely it’s worth the effort. For CEOs or senior managers, I would have said it’s probably the most important part of their job.

Easy enough? Now about fusing together those pesky light nuclei…